Tuesday, January 14, 2014

I don't have anything interesting to blog about other than that I never posted my extensive research paper about Harry Potter and generation Y on here. I'm now working on much more fun things, ie, my fiction. More posts to come. Enjoy!

 Magic Makes Morals Manifest: A Look at the Ways in which J.K. Rowling’s
Harry Potter Series Has Developed the Ethics of Generation Y
When most great novelists set their pens to paper or hands to keyboards, the intent is to tell a story. They do not first think of the morals they will impart on their readers or the lives they will change. Instead they first think of the story they need to tell. This is what J.K. Rowling did when she began writing her Harry Potter series. She had an idea, a story that needed to be told. This idea grew to be a seven-book series that was translated into over 60 languages and has sold over 325 million copies worldwide (Granger xi). According to Steven Pappas, “No other series of books has been read by more people; and nearly all of the film adaptations are among the top-grossing films of all time.” This story has reached hundreds of millions of people through its words on the page and story on the screen because Rowling wrote a fantastic tale.
Crucial to the storyline of the Harry Potter series is the morals and values of Rowling’s characters. The media has a large impact on the formation of children and young adults’ attitudes. As Geo Athena Trevarthen writes, “Whatever color their ink, words on the paper open us to bigger realities. Great books don’t just pass the time; they bring a greater sense of meaning to our lives. They tell us things about the world and ourselves” (13). Because of the epic reach of the novels and the time of the books’ publications, the influence of J. K. Rowling’s Harry Potter series has profoundly affected the Millennial Generation and has been a key component in the development of this generation.
To prove this theory, one must first define the Millennial Generation and examine several values of the Harry Potter series that have affected this generation. The Millennial Generation, or Generation Y, is most commonly quoted as encompassing those born from around the year 1982 to approximately 2002. These are individuals of the Internet age, cell phones, hundreds of television channels, social media, and, of course, Harry Potter, the dates of which expand from 1997 to 2011 if one includes the year of the first novel (Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone) to the last year of the last movie (Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part II). Many Millennials came of age with Rowling’s main characters, Harry Potter, Ron Weasley, and Hermione Granger, as the novels each consist of one year of the characters’ schooling from age 11 to 17. To see the effects of Rowling’s novels on the Millennial Generation, this discussion will highlight issues of acceptance and diversity: racial, gender, and sexual orientation equality and the value of blood and monetary status. The paper will also examine the formation of character in the Millennial Generation: what is considered to be good and evil, the ability to challenge tradition and authority and think critically and how this affects political choices, and the attitude that the world must come together to create a better society.
When defining the Millennial Generation, most sources will describe the group as being confident and optimistic when compared to older generations. Faced with difficulty finding jobs in the Great Recession, most Millennials still believe while they are not earning enough now, they will someday (Handley). They are the generation of school shootings; the War on Terrorism; busy, over-planned lives; the lowest parent-to-child ratio in American history; the most highly educated generation in history; and a group who grew up with technology at their fingertips. This generation is agreed to be more tolerant than those before it and to hold a new respect for the family (Gaylor). Through these points, whether historical factors, opinions brought on by those who came before the Millennials, or opinions of Generation Y about themselves, and many others, the Millennial Generation has come of age (or is still coming of age) and like all generations before it, certain media influences have played a role in its development.
As stated above, many Millennials came of age with Harry, Ron, and Hermione and all the rest of Rowling’s cast of characters. Being a generation of easy access to information and an expectation for almost instant results—what Generation Y-er would one ever see using a card catalogue, or even an encyclopedia for that matter, when she could simply Google her research—one would assume Millennials would be the last people to choose to read books of hundreds of pages like those that Rowling wrote. But they did. By the millions. The Millennials read the Harry Potter series so much so that critics have called them the Muggle Generation and fans have created ways to connect with one another all over the globe with Internet sites like Mugglenet.com, The Leaky Cauldron, and Mugglespace.com. They have video games, Harry Potter music by Wizard Rock bands, and recipes for wizard foods, and colleges around the nation have started Quidditch teams. Millennials dressed up and attended midnight releases of the series’ movies adding some of the top grossing movies of all time to Rowling’s list of achievements. With this range of influence one can begin to understand how Harry Potter helped form the values of an entire generation.
Anthony Gierzynski of the University of Vermont asked a group of students (members of Generation Y) what they thought defined their generation and the students listed the following: “school shootings in Columbine, Colorado; the Monica Lewinsky scandal; cell phones; the 2000 presidential election; the development of the Internet; September 11, 2001; the Bush presidency; reality TV; wars in Afghanistan and Iraq; hip-hop culture; Hurricane Katrina; global warming, Facebook, YouTube, the move toward same-sex marriage, and Harry Potter” (42). One student went on to say:
Harry Potter was one of the great cultural events of our generation’s [the Millennial Generation’s] time. Harry Potter helped raise the children of our generation by instilling in them some of the basic moral conceptions of right and wrong. In the series there is a very clear “good side,” epitomized by Harry Potter, which embodies the basic qualities of love, loyalty, courage, and forgiveness. Juxtaposed is a very clear “bad-side,” epitomized by He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named, which embodies all of the negative qualities of deceitfulness, vengeance, and killing. (Gierzynski 42)
Short of Facebook, YouTube, and the hip-hop culture, Harry Potter was the lone media source that this group of Millennials thought defined them. These students latched on to no other television shows, books or movies.
Joel Stein of Time Magazine berated Millennials as being the “Me, Me, Me Generation,” claiming that “the incident of narcissistic personality disorder is nearly three times as high for people in their 20s as for the generation that’s now 65 or older…” and writing that while the parents of Millennials attempted to boost their children’s self-esteem they really boosted narcissism. Stein believes another quality of this generation is its sense of entitlement. Already mentioned is the desire of this generation to have everything at their fingertips; Stein would add that with the easy access Millennials have to their peers with cell phones and social media, they struggle to develop under the influence of older individuals, an influence that Stein’s sources deem necessary. While Stein and his sources would not approve of Millennial teens gaining influence from more teens as they already believe Millennials receive too much influence from their peers, Anna Kelner writes of the attacks on the Millennial Generation’s development on her blog with reference to Rowling’s stating that “[f]or a generation [Generation Y] that has been given everything except, perhaps, strong values, Harry Potter is the best source of moral guidance it has.” Maybe self confidence (or narcissism) is not a quality older generations like seeing in Millennials; however, many values of the Harry Potter series are becoming headline news and as the newcomers to America’s political and social scene, these values are going to bear weight whether older generations accept this or not.
What, then, is the moral guidance Harry Potter has given to Generation Y? As mentioned above, one of the defining characteristics of the Millennial Generation is their higher degree of tolerance as compared to older generations. The Pew Research Center conducted a study in 2010 of trends in the Millennial Generation as compared to Generation X (who Pew Research Center defines as being born between the years of 1965-1980), The Baby Boomer Generation (1946-1964), The Silent Generation (1928-1945), and the Greatest Generation (born before 1928) (Millennials 11). The Pew Research Center found that Millennials are significantly less likely to view interracial marriage as “a bad thing for society” (5% Millennials, 10% Generation X, 14% Boomers, 26% Silent) (59) and researchers found that Millennials consider a higher level of liberalism and tolerance to be one of the top three characteristics that sets them apart from the previous generations (13).
A great theme of the Harry Potter series is the value of befriending those who are historically considered marginalized. Harry’s first friend in the wizarding world is Hagrid, a half giant who, readers later learn, was kicked out of Hogwarts School of Witch Craft and Wizardry and banned from using magic but still does so illegally (Rowling, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone 59) and born a half-giant (Rowling, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire 428). Full-blood giants are feared and considered to be inferior by the witches and wizards of Rowling’s universe. The headmaster of Hogwarts and one of the greatest wizards of all time in the Harry Potter series, Albus Dumbledore, however, trusts Hagrid with some of the most important tasks in regards to taking care of Harry, the young boy prophesied to save the world from evil Voldemort, the Dark Lord. Hagrid flies Harry to his aunt and uncle’s home as a baby and he is in charge of bringing Harry into the wizarding world for the first time. Hagrid also proves to be one of Harry’s most loyal and loving friends throughout the series by caring for the boy like the family Harry never had. Even though Hagrid looks like someone most wizards would count as a lesser creature, Harry extends the kindness Hagrid shows to him and loves Hagrid in return for the person Hagrid is rather than for the person Hagrid looks like he is.
Rowling gives her readers numerous other examples of times where Harry looks to the character of a person (or human-like creature) rather than the appearance of that person regardless of what others’ preconceived notions are of these beings. Remus Lupin, a werewolf, becomes a father figure to Harry. Lupin teaches Harry how to fight dementors (Rowling, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban 236), Harry’s biggest fear; and Lupin is also a part of the Order of the Phoenix, a society of wizards who bravely fight Voldemort to the death rather than hide from the fight against evil or join the Dark Lord’s forces (Rowling, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix 58). Like Hagrid, Lupin is trusted by Dumbledore during Harry’s third year to teach young witches and wizards even though many of the children’s parents would think lowly of Lupin if they knew of the man’s otherness.
Rowling casts Dumbledore as the man to lead her young witches and wizards to become more interested in the person’s character rather than the person’s looks. Half-giant Hagrid always has a warm fire for Harry to sit by and shabbily-dressed Lupin always has a chocolate frog for Harry to recover with as opposed to the beautiful Gilderoy Lockhart who is more interested in using Harry to boost his own image than helping Harry in his quest and learn and grow as a young wizard as he does in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets.
Harry also receives significant help from Dobby, a house-elf, and Firenze, a centaur, during his quest. These creatures are both regarded by many wizards as being inferior. House-elves are forever bound into servitude to wizarding families, required to wear nothing but rags and physically beat themselves if they break their families’ rules or speak ill of the family. Wizards like Ron who grew up in the wizarding world do not typically question the way of this abuse. They see this enslavement as normal. “‘We’ve been working like house-elves here!’” Ron cries after a long night of homework (Rowling, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire 223). Those new to the ways of witches and wizards, like Hermione, however are appalled at what they witness. Hermione rages at the way house-elves are treated, showing readers that even if something is almost universally accepted as “normal” does not make the poor treatment of others, no matter who or what they are, right.
While the house-elves are doomed to unabashedly worship and forever serve their masters, centaurs choose to be independent of the wizard community. They are wary of wizards and most feel they should stay out of wizarding affairs. Firenze, however, goes against his community when he chooses to help Harry. He also sees beyond the small scope of what his community believes is the best choice and chooses to follow his own path and be independent. He chooses to do what he believes is right even though this choice means he is ostracized from his entire group of like beings and is forced to live with those of another kind. The first time he helps Harry in Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, Bane, a member of Firenze’s herd, yells at Firenze, ‘“What are you doing? You have a human on your back! Have you no shame? Are you a common mule?”’ (Rowling 257). In Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Dumbledore employs Firenze to teach Divination and his herd attacks him seeing this employment an act of betrayal to their kind (Rowling 601). Unable to return to his herd, Firenze remains at Hogwarts for the next two years even fights alongside Harry and his friends during the last battle at Hogwarts against Voldemort (Rowling, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows 745).
Important to all of these creatures and the role they play in showing Millennials the value of tolerance is Dumbledore’s belief in the goodness of all of them. Dumbledore custodies Hagrid to take Harry to his aunt’s house after his parents are killed even though Hagrid is both a half giant and did not finish his schooling. Dumbledore trusts Lupin to teach his students and values him as an integral player in the Order, which will lead the fight against Voldemort. Dumbledore entertains Dobby’s wish to be paid when he goes to work at Hogwarts when no other house-elf had probably had to courage to ask for (or the agency to desire) such a thing (Rowling, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire 379). Dumbledore employs Firenze to teach his students Divination even though Dumbledore knows the other centaurs’ ill feelings toward wizards and their abandonment of Firenze. As Sarah Quartley writes:
Essentially, Dumbledore is concerned with the individual.  The metaphorical issues of race, class, ability, and achievement that J.K. Rowling constructs in the world of Harry Potter carry little or no importance for Dumbledore.  In this way, Dumbledore expresses to youth and adults alike that what society perceives of them is of no matter as long as they are fighting for or doing what is right and good. 
Youth are constantly told that they are the future of the world. Rowling has given Millennials a perfect teacher in Dumbledore and an excellent peer in Harry to show America’s youth how to move forward with less bigotry and judgment. Through her story telling and not through lecture, Rowling captivated a generation when their minds were forming their worldviews. She taught them to look past appearances and to look into the character of every individual before judgment. Her influence has shown its prevalence in Millennials views on tolerance versus the views of generations before them.  
            Another large topic in America’s media today is the tolerance of gay, lesbian, transgender and bisexual individuals. While the issue of gay rights is not ever touched on in Rowling’s series, she did stir the pot when she told some 2,000 fans that the great wizard, headmaster of Hogwarts and mentor to Harry, Albus Dumbledore, is gay (Siegel). ABC News writer, Hanna Siegel quotes a fan’s note from the Harry Potter fan site The Leaky Cauldron: “This is a victory for homosexuality the world over…Dumbledore is iconic, and I can’t wait for all those little children to hear about this. I am so insanely proud of [Rowling] for doing this.”
Pew Research Center’s study on Generation Y and previous generations finds that a major difference between Millennials and the generations before them is their exposure to, and relationships with, gay people. Pew Research finds that over fifty percent of Millennials have gay friends or family members compared to forty-six percent of Generation X, forty-four percent of Baby Boomers and twenty-four percent of the Silent Generation. Pew researchers believe that because of this exposure, Millennials are more comfortable with the issue of gay marriage with almost two-thirds of Generation Y-ers polled being in favor of gay and lesbian marriage (62). Pew Research also finds Millennials to be the only generation in favor of gay marriage (51). Siegel quotes Rowling stating that Rowling believes her novels are a “prolonged argument for tolerance.” While Rowling’s teachings may not be the main factor in the drive for tolerance toward gay people, gay marriage rights have become a highly debated topic during the height of Millennials’ political coming of age and the teachings of tolerance and equality Rowling has helped guide her millions of Millennial readers.          
            In addition to writing about the benefits of judging others based on character rather than appearance or sexual orientation, Rowling also uses the value of character over blood and/or wealth status to help teach Millennials to extend their tolerance to all those around them, no matter a person’s background. As Sirius tells Ron, “‘If you want to know what a man's like, take a good look at how he treats his inferiors, not his equals’” (Rowling, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire 525). Both of Harry’s best friends, Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger, are of backgrounds that many prominent wizarding families would look down upon. Ron’s family, while consider pure blooded (no non-magical blood in its bloodline), is scorned by other pure blood families because of the Weasley’s kindness toward non-wizards and their lack of money. Ron’s father, Arthur Weasley, works for the ministry of magic in their Misuse of Muggle (those who are non-magic) Artifacts department. Luscious Malfoy, another pure blooded family line, says of Arthur’s job, “‘Dear me, what’s the use of being a disgrace to the name of wizard if they don’t even pay you well for it?”’ (Rowling, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets 62). However, the Malfoys continuously show themselves to be of low character despite their wealth and pure blood status—joining with Voldemort, mistreating their house-elf, bullying others—and the Weasleys continuously show their noble character—opening their home to Harry as if he were family, becoming leaders of the resistance against Voldemort. The sheer contrast between the Weasleys and the Malfoys teaches readers that all the money in the world cannot buy good character nor does the purest blood breed goodness.
Even being born into a family with no magical blood, Hermione Granger is the smartest witch in her class at Hogwarts. Her quick thinking and precision of spells save Harry and others countless times throughout Rowling’s series. However, no matter how much more intelligent and better at spells she proves herself to be, there are several students who still see Hermione as beneath them because of her non-magic parents. Draco Malfoy and others like him who believe in the sanctity of pure magic blood call Hermione and others like her “Mudbloods.” When Malfoy calls Hermione a Mudblood, Ron explains to Harry and Hermione, ‘“It’s about the most insulting thing he could think of…Mudblood’s a really foul name for someone who is Muggle-born…There are some wizards—like Malfoy’s family—who think they’re better than everyone else because they’re what people call pure-blood…I mean, the rest of us know it doesn’t make any difference at all”’ (Rowling, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets 116). Hagrid goes on to comment that there has yet to be a spell that has stumped Hermione showing that magical prowess and talent cannot be damped by one’s origin.
Hermione serves as a great inspiration to Millennial females. One Millennial says of Hermione, “I cannot remember any shows or movies I watched, or books I read in my youth, that had a strong female protagonist. Hermione Granger, the lead female character in the in the Harry Potter series, was like me. She liked to read…to write…to learn. She was smart…confident… and she grew into her beauty” (Gierzynski 77). Rowling shows her readers that no matter where they came from, the content of their mind and heart are what matter, and these are the things she urges her readers to look to when judging others, not the status of their familial background.
Additional to Ron and Hermione’s backgrounds, even Harry himself is of “mixed blood” as his mother was a Muggle-born witch and his father of wizarding ancestry. According to Pew Research, Millennials are far less likely than any generation before them to believe that interracial marriage is a “bad thing” for society (52). Rowling displays her case on this issue with the marriage of pure blood wizards (Ron Weasley) marrying Muggle-blood witches (Hermione Granger) (Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows 755) as well as those who marry someone with “tainted blood” like Remus Lupin, a werewolf, and Nymphadora Tonks, a witch (Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows 46).
            To show Millennials’ tolerance as a result of the Harry Potter series, a study conducted by Anthony Gierzynski and Kathryn Eddy will be examined. Gierzynski and Eddy’s survey polled members of the Millennial generation who read all seven Harry Potter books, who had read some of the books and/or saw the movies and who had neither read the books nor seen the movies and found that those who had read the novels had “significant warmer feelings toward different groups [of people]” (Gierzynski 52). The groups of people Gierzynski and Eddy polled their American youth about were Muslims, African Americans, undocumented immigrants, and homosexuals (51). With the above indication that Millennials are more likely than older generations to support gay and interracial marriage, the influence of Rowling’s teaching of tolerance to all can be seen. Gierzynski and Eddy’s study also found that Millennials who read Rowling’s series believe the American government should promote more equality than those who did not read the books. As shown above with the contrast in character of the Weasley family and the Malfoy family, Harry Potter favors a hard-working middle class over blood and monetary status.
            As stated earlier, many observers of the Millennial Generation feel that this generation is a confident one. Whether these people are critical of the Millennials’ confidence, like Stein, or feel Generation Y’s optimism toward the future is a positive result of their self-confidence, some of these feelings could be attributed to Rowling’s series. Important to a story written for a young person is that the protagonist be a young person as well. Harry is brave and smart and a strong character, sure, but he is also one very important thing—a child. So many Millennials grew up along with Harry and saw him save the world, but also make mistakes, get detention and have crushes just like them. Harry, Ron, and Hermione are students to whom most American teens can relate even though the characters are living in a magical world. Not only does Dumbledore teach readers and his students about tolerance, but he also teaches them to believe in themselves. When Harry and Dumbledore go to find a horocrux in Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, the pair has to fight off some of the darkest magic either has seen. A potion weakens Dumbledore and Harry continuously tells his professor that things will be all right. Dumbledore responds, “‘I am not worried, Harry…I am with you’” (Rowling 578). Dumbledore believes in the power of a young, inexperienced wizard to protect him and through the entire series of novels to save the world. This confidence is part of what researchers have found to be such a prominent trait in Millennials. This generation is looking to do big things; they just need to be given a chance.
Harry Potter not only grew up an orphan and found out that he is part of a secret magical world quite separate from the world he thought he knew, but also he finds that he is prophesized to save both the wizarding and Muggle worlds. As stated above, being new to the magical world, Harry must find allies who will help his cause. Just like the real world, however, Rowling’s characters are multi-dimensional, being neither wholly good nor wholly evil. Harry and his readers must look critically at every situation to learn who to trust and who to hold at a distance.
Millennials have grown up in a world where they can easily hide behind computer screens and texts messages rather than confront each other in face-to-face interactions. However, Gierzynski and Eddy found that Millennials who read Harry Potter are more likely than those who did not to participate in political activities “reflecting the story’s need to act and, efficacy of doing something to fight what is wrong in the world” (58). Anna Kelner writes of the complexity of Rowling’s characters and their influence on the morals of Generation Y by stating:
In Harry Potter, heroes can quickly turn into foes, and Rowling demands that her readership evaluate and reevaluate their understanding of the difference between good guys and bad guys. Thus, she provides the Facebook generation [Generation Y] with a rare and important opportunity for moral reasoning. As Lauren Hinnendyk and Kimberly A. Schonert-Reichl wrote in 2002 in the Journal of Moral Education, “because the Harry Potter stories are classic fairy tales—that is, stories that revolve around the struggle of good versus evil and moral obligation—the exploits of Harry Potter and his colleagues not only serve as a source of entertainment but can provide an impetus for children’s social and moral development as well.”
And Harry does act. In Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone, eleven-year-old Harry chooses the dangerous paths of saving Hermione from the troll (Rowling 176), jumping on a broom for the first time and diving to save Neville’s stolen Rememberall (Rowling 149), and thwarts Voldemort’s attempt at stealing the Sorcerer’s Stone (Rowling 292). Breaking the rules and confronting danger head on are clearly not the easy choices. Harry shows his fans that one is never too young to make the brave choice—the choice in favor of good over evil.
            Rowling does not make the line between good and evil clear-cut for her readers. Her characters are flawed just like the people Millennials will deal with their whole lives. Harry comes of age struggling with his hatred and distrust of his potions teacher, and known former Voldemort support, Severus Snape. While Snape gives Harry plenty of reason to dislike him—mocking Harry in class, insulting Harry’s father, and giving Harry detentions—at the end of the series, in Snape’s final breaths of life, Harry and readers learn that Snape had been protecting Harry and began his life as a double agent against Voldemort because of his love for Harry’s mother. This twist helps teach readers to not take everyone at face value—a lesson Generation Y, the “Facebook Generation,” can take to heart especially when so much of their interactions are done via profiles on the internet. As Kelner writes: 
By prompting her audience to explore the nebulous concept of character—something which cannot be determined by a Facebook profile or memorized from a textbook—Rowling provides her readers with information not readily accessed in the modern age. With religious attendance in decline, Generation Y must discover a new source of morality that can help them reason through modern challenges like the worth of the ever-expanding War on Terror and the rules of “netiquette”.
Kelner goes on to quote Dumbledore’s perfect summation of “the root of Harry’s success: ‘Of house-elves and children's tales, of love, loyalty, and innocence, Voldemort knows and understands nothing. Nothing. That they all have a power beyond his own, a power beyond the reach of any magic, is a truth he has never grasped’ (Rowling, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows 709-10).
Love and loyalty play a huge role in Rowling’s novels. Love saves Harry time and time again from Voldemort’s power. This obvious goodness proves to be the strongest magic in the wizarding world. Love gives a baby the power to defeat one of the most powerful wizards of all time. Harry’s loyalty to do the right thing and stay true to those he loves gives him the fortitude and the followers to defeat Voldemort a second and final time at the end of the series. If, as Kelner states and other studies on Millennials find (“Millennials” 85), religion is not playing as significant a role in the development of Generation Y’s morals as it did in those generations of the past, what better teaching of morality than the triumph of love and loyalty over evil?
            In addition to characters who seem bad but are actually good, Harry often comes in contact with characters of authority, who one would assume are good because of their leadership positions, who are actually quite corrupt. Most of these officials are in the political sphere of the wizarding world. Andrew Lowosky writes that Rowling portrays the Ministry of Magic as “as a rigid, ineffectual bureaucracy incapable of protecting its subjects from any meaningful threat.” Cornelius Fudge, Minister of Magic while Harry first comes to Hogwarts, denies Harry’s eyewitness account to Voldemort’s return (Rowling, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire 705). In the same novel, Rita Skeeter’s embellished reporting for The Daily Prophet calls readers to examine what they read and make their own judgments rather than believing whatever they are told. In Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix, Fudge discredits Harry’s claims of Voldemort’s return and takes control of the media to portray Harry in a negative light in attempt to keep the wizarding community in the dark about Voldemort’s threat. Fudge refuses to believe that Voldemort could return and thus leaves his people clueless about the danger that is growing in the shadows. In this way Rowling shows her readers they need to be willing to read and listen critically and make their own judgments rather than blindly follow those in power.
            Gierzynski and Eddy found Millennials who read Harry Potter to be just that: skeptical. The pair asked Millennials if they believed in common conspiracy theories “such as the notion that the moon landing was fake, that global warming is a myth, that there was a conspiracy to assassinate JFK, and that the US government staged the September 11th attacks…As hypothesized, Harry Potter fans were more likely to pick the skeptical responses” as forty-four percent of fans polled answered that they thought there was truth to one or two of these theories as compared to fifty-two percent of nonfans (60-1). This evidence shows that many Millennials who read Harry Potter are more cautious about what the government tells them to believe.
Rufus Scrimgeour takes over as Minster of Magic after Fudge and, while he takes the threat of Voldemort seriously, he is just as ineffective at stopping the Dark Lord as Fudge was. Scrimgeour wants Harry to join up with him because Harry has support of the people and if Harry backs Scrimgeour then so will the rest wizarding world who opposes Voldemort. Harry, however, does not agree with Scrimgeour’s politics and refuses saying:
 “…Has anyone ever tried sticking a sword in Voldemort? Maybe the Ministry should put some people onto that, instead of wasting their time stripping down Deluminators or covering up breakouts from Azkaban [the wizarding jail]. So is this what you’ve been doing, Minister, shut up in your office, trying to break open a Snitch? People are dying—I was nearly one of them—Voldemort chased me across three counties, he killed Mad-Eye Moody, but there’s been no world about any of that from the Ministry, has there?” (Rowling, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows 129-30)
Ineffective in an entirely different way than Fudge was, Scrimgeour tries to hide the truth from the public about the danger that they are in. He chooses to give the people only part of the truth, rather than admit that he does not have total control over the growing threat that Voldemort imposes.
Later in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Voldemort and his followers have effectively infiltrated the Ministry of Magic; taken over The Daily Prophet, the wizarding world’s main body of media; and posted followers in several positions in Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. Voldemort creates a world in which no one is sure whom to trust. Once again, Rowling teaches her readers to question what they hear and read.
            The impact of skepticism in the trustworthiness of political figures can also be seen in Millennials’ voting habits. In their book, Harry Potter and the Millennials: Research Methods and the Politics of the Muggle Generation, Gierzynski and Eddy write:
…[w]e acquire political values and views from our culture. We learn how to act and what to value in our society from people…and institutions…and the media…From our preteen years to our adolescence, when we are just becoming aware of the political world and forming our initial impressions, these agents can have a tremendous impact on the values and outlooks that form the basis of our politics. The Millennial Generation became engrossed in Harry Potter at just this time in their political socialization, heightening the potential impact and making it so that the tales from the wizarding world may have a significant impact on shaping the nature of their generation. (8)
Gierzynski and Eddy go on to investigate the voting habits of the Millennial Generation. In line with Pew Research Center’s study on Millennials, Gierzynski and Eddy found Millennials to be some of Barak Obama’s strongest supporters in America’s 2008 election.
As discussed above, Millennials who read the Harry Potter series were found to be more eager for participation in volunteer and political activities. Obama’s campaign for hope and change resonated with a generation who has been heavily affected by the most recent recession, but hasn’t lost optimism about the future (“Millennials” 40). According to Pew Research Center, Millennials are far more likely (88%) to believe that they will earn enough money to life a happy life in the future as compared to seventy-six percent of Generation Xers and forty-six percent of Baby Boomer polled about the same recession (40). While Generation Y’s optimism may not be dimmed by the recession, Gierzynski and Eddy found Harry Potter fans to be more skeptical of the government than non-fans (71). “In interviews with fans, most attributed their views on government to the Harry Potter series” (Gierzynski 71). When asked if a Millennial could see anything from the Harry Potter series in the student’s self, one student responded: “…[A]n awareness about corruption in government…I think that maybe people who like, were aware of it, in the way that reading would, sort of, react to it faster?” (Gierzynski 71).
This desire for change and skepticism of government can be seen in the Millennials heavy support in the 2008 election for President Barak Obama. Pew Research Center finds that those over the age of thirty, voters of generations before the Millennials, were near split between Obama and John McCain (Obama 50%, McCain 48%). Millennials, however, were overwhelmingly supportive of Obama (Obama 66%, McCain 32%). Not only did Pew researchers find that this was “the largest disparity between younger and older voters recorded in four decades of modern exit polling” but they also found that  “after decades of low voter participation by the young, the turnout gap in 2008 between voters under and over the age of 30 was the smallest it had been in any election since 18- to 20-year-olds were given the right to vote in 1972” (63). In Gierzynski and Eddy’s study of Millennials, they found that a higher percentage of Harry Potter fans believed that historians would view the George W. Bush administration unfavorably (83%) than non-fans (74%) (58) and were even more likely to have voted for Barak Obama in 2008 (Obama 58%, McCain 15%, Other 3%, Did not vote 24%) than non-fans (Obama 45%, McCain 23%, Other 3%, Did not vote 29%) (61).
Because of the level of corruption Harry sees in his government, he sees no better answer than to take matters into his own hands. Harry must learn to depend on himself and those he has found to be trustworthy rather than believe that the political system and the adults around him will solve problems. Harry and his friends have taught Millennials to not only be skeptical of the government and media, but they have also taught Generation Y to take matters into their own hands and be active in changing that government as examined in the high voter turnout among Millennials. As one member of Generation Y told Gierzynski and Eddy, “What Harry did for me as I was growing up was to provide me with a template for human interactions that I could refer to as I struggled through different social situations…he showed me examples of when to be respectful, when to rebel, how to be gracious, how to resolve conflicts with friends and foes alike” (76). Clearly Harry Potter functioned as a positive role model to many children who grew up with him.
In addition to Harry’s critical examination of those in power and his desire to act, Harry also teaches his readers to practice non-violence. The members of the Order of the Phoenix, those who oppose Voldemort, reprimand Harry time and again for using disarming and other non-violent spells to repel his foes. However, Harry tells them, “‘I won’t blast people out of the way just because they’re there…That’s Voldemort’s job’” (Rowling, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows 71). Rowling shows her readers that even though Voldemort and his followers would aim to kill Harry, Harry will not compromise his character and take another’s life. Much like Harry and his friends detest the poor treatment of house-elves and other marginalized characters in the series, Harry has strong beliefs in the value of human life. While this is shown countless times throughout the series, possibly the most telling interaction of Harry’s morality is the bravery he showed in saving Draco Malfoy’s life.
Draco Malfoy is an enemy to Harry from almost the onset of their first year at Hogwarts and is even poised to kill Harry’s most trusted mentor, Dumbledore, for Voldemort during book six, Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince. In the last book of the series, even when Malfoy’s allegiance to Voldemort is clear, and Malfoy and his cronies are firing killing curses at Harry, Ron, and Hermione in the Room of Requirement, Harry insists on risking his own life, and the lives of his friends, to save Malfoy, his enemy (Rowling, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows 633). This unwavering integrity and commitment to do what he believes is right, no matter the consequences has resonated with Millennials who are fans of Rowling’s series. Gierzynski and Eddy found that, “…Potter fans seem to reflect the series’s [sic] lessons on the use of deadly force from the series, showing less support for the death penalty and disagreeing with the statement that hunting down and killing terrorists is the best way to deal with the threat of terrorism.” When Gierzynski and Eddy asked Millennials, “would you regard the use of torture against people suspected of involvement in terrorism as acceptable or unacceptable?” thirty-one percent of nonfans found torture acceptable while only twenty-one percent of fans did (56-58). Pew Research Center also found Generation Y, along with Generation X, to be significantly less supportive of the use of military force to achieve peace (79). Shifts toward a more tolerant community, an optimistic but quizzical mind toward politics, and a desire to create a less violent world are all becoming themes research has shown Millennials are working toward for the future of their world. Rowling’s fictional characters have given Generation Y peers to show them a way to make this world a reality.
The optimism of Millennials is repeated time and again when researchers write about this generation. The world mentioned above, tolerant, open-minded, peaceful, may sound like a utopia to generations before Generation Y, however, these youth see this future as attainable. Millennials believe they have the power to create change. They put their faith in a president who campaigned for change. They have followed a fictional boy who strove for a better world and helped destroy the evil around him to create it.
Unlike their world of instant information, the power to change their future will not be instant or easy. Harry Potter taught Millennials that they have the choice to make the changes they want to see in their world. While the difference in percentage may be small (Millennials 57%, Generation X 54%, Baby Boomers 52% and Silent Generation 39%), Pew researchers found Millennials to have done more volunteer work in the year prior to their survey than any other generation before (83). These researchers also found Millennials to be slightly more likely than older generations to boycott brands with whose social or political activities they disagreed and were slightly more likely to buy from consumers who Millennials felt had good social or political views (“Millennials” 84). Being the generation with the lowest incomes as they are either students or just beginning their careers, that Millennials are making choices to volunteer their time and purchase products based on merit rather than price speaks volumes to the level of commitment many members of Generation Y have to changing the world around them into what they view as a better place. Volunteerism and product boycotting and buycotting, buying products because the consumer values the producer’s practices (“Millennials” 84) may sound like small steps, but they are steps toward change nonetheless.
Millennials also know that their small contributions can create worldwide change when a group of likeminded individuals can start working as a whole. As a generation partially defined by school shootings, terrorism, a recession, and war, one might think Millennials would find optimism a hard attitude to follow when looking toward the future. However, as has been found by many researchers and repeated throughout this discussion, Millennials’ spirits have not damped. Millennials have bright views of the future and part of this could be because, like Harry Potter, Millennials know that they are not in the trek alone.
From her very first novel in which Hermione’s knowledge (Rowling 286), Ron’s chess skills (Rowling 283), and Harry’s bravery (Rowling 292) break through a labyrinth of tests meant to stump even the most powerful and clever witches and wizards when the students are only eleven, Rowling shows readers that they are at their greatest strength when combining their skill sets with those of their friends. Dumbledore constantly preaches the power of the collective group when withstanding evil versus the power of the individual. When Lord Voldemort regained his body in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, Dumbledore addressed his students and faculty and those of two visiting schools from other wizarding nations by saying, “…we are only as strong as we are united, as weak as we are divided. Lord Voldemort’s gift for spreading discord and enmity is very great. We can fight it only by showing an equally strong bond of friendship and trust. Differences of habit and language are nothing at all if our aims are identical and our hearts are open” (Rowling 723). In this passage, Rowling perfectly conveys to her readers the message Millennials heard from her for so much of their formative years: together, one strong group can effect positive change in the world no matter their differences in background.
Pew researchers found Millennials to put the most value on their relationships with others as opposed to making large sums of money or being famous. Most Millennials felt that “being a good parent,” “having a successful marriage,” and “helping others in need,” were, respectively, the most important things in life as opposed to “being successful in a high paying career,” “having lots of free time,” and “becoming famous” (18). This echoes Hermione’s feelings in Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone when she tells Harry, “‘Books! And cleverness! There are far more important things—friendship and bravery…” (Rowling 287). Millennials are focusing on each other rather than, as Stein would believe, themselves. In this way they will move the world forward.
Millennials are ready to make their generation’s mark in history. They have learned from generations past, technology of the future, and their present peers. They look optimistically toward hope and change and know they can make a difference together no matter what the current situation is. They know the spell for success will not take the magic of Harry Potter’s world, but one they create with a change in the treatment of others, a willingness to act and a skeptical, but optimistic attitude. They know they can be successful because peers of a fictional universe have shown them how. J.K. Rowling and Harry Potter taught Generation Y how to move their nation forward by their own terms rather than by the terms of the officials in place. They have been taught love and loyalty are the most powerful magic they can use in making this future a reality. Rowling’s words helped spur action in a generation many accuse of being glued to their computer chairs. Her story taught these youth to trust themselves, question what has been done before, and put their faith in others based on the person’s heart rather than background. If Generation Y’s Voldemort is intolerance, apathy toward giving time, and violence, Millennials are ready with the magic of their optimism and eagerness to face their foe. They have time and a great story’s role models to fall back on when they need to be reminded what a young generation can do. As the generation poised to take the reigns in the future of America, Rowling has given them the best role models and teachers to know that they, and the rest of their peers have nowhere to go but up and forward. They have all the confidence they need and have learned, as Dumbledore taught them, “‘…it matters not what someone is born, but what they grow up to be’” (Rowling, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire 708). One could reform his statement to be that it matters not the state of the world a generation inherits, but how they progress that world and as has been shown, Millennials are willing to take and optimistic about taking the steps to change their world. Rowling’s words in print and on screen truly brought more meaning to the lives of millions of Millennials, teaching them about the world and their place in it and there is nowhere for Millennials to go but to go but forward using the magic they create together.



Works Cited

Gaylor, Dennis. "Generational Differences." Http://www.ceplearning.org/. Chi Alpha Campus Ministries, Apr. 2002. Web. 15 Sept. 2013.

Gierzynski, Anthony, and Kathryn Eddy. Harry Potter and the Millennials: Research Methods and the Politics of the Muggle Generation. Baltimore: John Hopkins UP, 2013. Print.

Granger, John. How Harry Cast His Spell: The Meaning behind the Mania for J. K. Rowling's Bestselling Books. Carol Stream, IL: SaltRiver/Tyndale House, 2008. Print.

Handley, Meg. "Recession Woes Haven't Dampened Optimism Among Millennials." US News. U.S.News & World Report, 14 Feb. 2012. Web. 04 Oct. 2013.

"Harry Potter, Radical Feminism and the Power of Love." The Ultimate Harry Potter and Philosophy: Hogwarts for Muggles. Ed. Gregory Bassham. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2010. 80-93. Print.

Jack Deavel, Catherine, and David Paul Deavel. "Choosing Love: The Redemption of Severus Snape." The Ultimate Harry Potter and Philosophy: Hogwarts for Muggles. Ed. Gregory Bassham. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2010. 53-63. Print.

Kelner, Anna. "The Problem with Gen Y and Its Search for Answers in Harry." The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 16 Aug. 2009. Web. 8 Aug. 2013.

Lay Williams, David, and Allen J. Kellner. "Dumbledore, Plato, and the Lust for Power." The Ultimate Harry Potter and Philosophy: Hogwarts for Muggles. Ed. Gregory Bassham. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2010. 128140. Print.

Losowsky, Andrew. "The Hidden Messages Of Harry Potter (EXCERPT)." The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 23 July 2012. Web. 13 Aug. 2013.

"Millennials: Confident. Connected. Open to Change." Pew Social Demographic Trends RSS. Ed. Paul Taylor and Scott Keeter. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Sept. 2013.

Pappas, Steven M. "UVM Study: Did Harry Potter Get Obama Elected? : Rutland Herald Online." The Rutland Herald RSS. N.p., 29 July 2013. Web. 3 Sept. 2013.
Quartey, Sarah. "STATIC." STATIC. Standford University, 6 Mar. 2012. Web. 30 July 2013.

Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets: Book 2. New York: Arthur A. Levine Books-Scholastic, 1999. Print.

Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Book 7. New York: Arthur A. Levine Books-Scholastic, 2007. Print.

Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire: Book 4. New York: Arthur A. Levine Books-Scholastic, 2000. Print.

Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince: Book 6. New York: Arthur A. Levine Books-Scholastic, 2005. Print.

Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix: Book 5. New York: Arthur A. Levine Books-Scholastic, 2003. Print.

Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban: Book 3. New York: Arthur A. Levine-Scholastic, 1999. Print.

Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone. New York: Scholastic, 1999. Print.

Siegel, Hanna. "Rowling Lets Dumbledore Out of the Closet." ABC News. ABC News Network, 20 Oct. 2007. Web. 15 Aug. 2013.

Trevarthen, Geo Athena. The Seeker's Guide to Harry Potter: The Unauthorized Course. Winchester, UK: O, 2008. Print.


Watson, Julie, and Tomas Kellner. "J.K. Rowling And The Billion-Dollar Empire." Forbes. Forbes Magazine, 26 Feb. 2004. Web. 1 Sept. 2013.

No comments:

Post a Comment